McLAUGHLIN v. SHINSATO

Insurance Fraud case. This was an example of how some carriers are assigning cases to their SIU units when they aren’t really fraud, apparently because their SIU units are very successful. This was a rear-ender accident involving claimed injury when there was none. I broke my rule against ever allowing a lawyer on the jury, especially a defense lawyer. I allowed a guy to sit even though he had been an unsuccessful candidate for a job that I had interviewed him for years ago with a prior law firm, because he assured me in voir dire that he wouldn’t allow his experience in evaluating cases to be part of the deliberations. He lied of course, and couldn’t help himself. He just had to be the smartest guy in the room, telling everyone that three times the medical expenses was the industry standard. He turned around people who only wanted to give $1,000 and secured a 9-3, $6,000 verdict for the plaintiff when I was about to get under a $3,000 CCP 998 offer.

Thank you. That was a great win. Please send us a copy of the court’s written decision. It is great news considering how low our expectations were in getting a favorable defendant’s decision in California.

- Glenette

Litigation Specialist/Claims Representative

We really appreciate the excellent work you have done and continue to do so. Over the last 5 years, I have learned that if I had to choose any defense attorney in the LA area to retain, you would be my first choice.

- Steven

Entertainment / Media Claims Representative

It was an amazing result.

- Nicholas

Excess Claims Carrier Representative

Thanks for all the great work.

- Cameron

Complex Claims Director

Gonzales v Mathis

In this case, we represented legendary singer Johnny Mathis. Plaintiff was a window washer who had fallen off the roof at Johnny’s home and become quadriplegic. Plaintiff had been walking on a narrow roof extension he had walked on many times before the fall and was familiar with the roof. Plaintiff had his own window […]

Settlement Demand: $30,000,000

Verdict: MSJ granted for defense and reaffirmed by the California Supreme Court

Frederic. T. Tanner

Perkins v. BET

We represented a staging and production company. Plaintiff was a Production Assistant for BET Networks at the First Annual BET Event. Plaintiff claimed she suffered injuries to both ankles and her back while escorting a high school marching band off the Sprite Basketball court when a wood stair case collapsed. During trial, the other defendants […]

Settlement Demand: $3,000,000

Verdict: 9-3 Defense Verdict

Frederic. T. Tanner & Steven A. Garcia

Ramirez Trial

Plaintiff, a 43-year-old driving instructor, was giving a driving lesson on a residential street in San Bernardino. Our client drove out of her driveway and her car was hit in a T-bone collision by Plaintiff’s vehicle. Liability was admitted, so the trial simply concerned the nature and extent of injuries. Plaintiff suffered a shoulder injury, […]

Settlement Demand: $100,000

Offer: $50,000

Verdict: $33,500

Jury poll: 11-1

Atkins – “Wheaton Terrier v. Child”

Plaintiff, a 6-year-old girl, along with her mother, approached a dog, a Wheaten Terrier with no prior history of bad behavior, in a public park. As she bent down to pet him, the dog jumped up and badly bit the girl’s face. Surgical repair was performed that day, but the child was left with a […]

Steven A. Garcia

Let's Get Started

We offer both split and blended rates in accordance with client preference.

Our standard billing practices respond to the most stringent industry requirements. Your comments and questions are of great interest to us.

Send Us a Message

Results