The information provided in this website is not intended as legal advice but is simply background information to assist you in deciding on legal counsel. Each case is distinctive and individual and no information provided here should be relied upon in deciding the merits of your case without personal consultation with legal counsel. Further, the laws may change since this website was developed. It is important that you discuss your case with competent legal counsel as soon as possible to properly protect your interests.
Disclaimer
Thank you. That was a great win. Please send us a copy of the court’s written decision. It is great news considering how low our expectations were in getting a favorable defendant’s decision in California.
- Glenette
Litigation Specialist/Claims Representative
We really appreciate the excellent work you have done and continue to do so. Over the last 5 years, I have learned that if I had to choose any defense attorney in the LA area to retain, you would be my first choice.
- Steven
Entertainment / Media Claims Representative
It was an amazing result.
- Nicholas
Excess Claims Carrier Representative
Thanks for all the great work.
- Cameron
Complex Claims Director
Gonzales v Mathis
Settlement Demand: $30,000,000
Verdict: MSJ granted for defense and reaffirmed by the California Supreme Court
Frederic. T. Tanner
Perkins v. BET
Settlement Demand: $3,000,000
Verdict: 9-3 Defense Verdict
Frederic. T. Tanner & Steven A. Garcia
Ramirez Trial
Settlement Demand: $100,000
Offer: $50,000
Verdict: $33,500
Jury poll: 11-1
Atkins – “Wheaton Terrier v. Child”
Steven A. Garcia
Let's Get Started
We offer both split and blended rates in accordance with client preference.
Our standard billing practices respond to the most stringent industry requirements. Your comments and questions are of great interest to us.
Send Us a Message